Really love her signature outfit - the underboob bikiny. Wish more girls would do this

Can't wait until miss Feld finally turns 16 in April

>>23986 This future number is shocking. That can't be right

>>23892 hands down, the best underboob game in the industry

>>24191 Any other pics from this shoot ever surface?

>>24466 Oooof yeah, hopefully anon will come through with that pic. Sounds like a good one.

>>24466 >>24467 >>24469 Ima just say no, not here. thanks

>>24470 sorry my dude, delete my if you want so other anons don't ask

>>24472 can't really say but just not trying to start any trend that can get us in trouble

>>24474 So you're not just useless, but also wasting people's time. Got ya. Typical.

>>24476 ur more than free to go somewhere where people can be more useful to you

>>24191 if u look closely she has pasties underneath ... not gonna see anything there

>>24482 Got taken down immediately

>>24482 Ok it’s up. Think anyone will be of any help?

>>24485 what are you even trying to post, that polaroid from clint?

>>24486 Anon posted the black and white image. Another anon asked if there was more from that shoot. Another anon said there was a good shot from that shoot from a different angle with a different top on. Yet another anon offered the Clint video in exchange for the shot referenced earlier.

>>24487 meh the clint videos aren't even that special, she's just in a bikini soaking under water

>>24488 No there’s another one. In the same bra from the Clint Polaroids.

>>24489 oh that one, got it, but it's not a big deal, lol don't know what the fuss is about

>>24490 Yeah but the whole discussion was about another see through pic that is apparently out there. Unclear if anon was referring to the Clint Polaroids we’ve all seen or something else.

>>24498 Alright Anon. You asked multiple times and you have a thread somewhere else asking for it. Ask here again and the thread has to be locked. I don't think I have to explain why.

>>24522 No disrespect, I get that your just playing it safe. But I consonantly find it funny how these forums make rules against things that would be ok. While naively allowing others that the courts have routinely ruled against. Those Emily pics in question look to be legally ok. But there are pics in other threads that are highly questionable in accordance with laws. Yet nothing is said about them. It's as if many just have assumptions of the laws. Without ever actually reading it or the various court rulings regarding it. Just a hint nudity is never actually mentioned in the law. And when talking about lewd exposer, they are specifically taking about the whats below the belt. Of course the site could be located in country with a different set rules. Then the US.

>>24543 and no disrespect to you, but I'm not sure you are aware of /waifuist/ history. We have jumped from multiple places and have done everything we can to just survive. Look around, tell me how many places like this exist. Tell me the forums that has made it pass a year without being brought down or hit with something at least once. To think we haven't gone down the line and continuously altered the rules over time just to get to this point is crazy talk. I can name places that try to be freer than us and still get shit. But at the end of the day, THIS place has rules. It's our job to make sure things are kept in line which also means checking the laws. So, if you care enough, by all means report things that are questionable or just enjoy what we have and the limits this place is allowed to go. I also find it funny you mentioned "rules against things that would be ok" when Clint went out his way to delete said pictures and videos from his page and got flak for it. and whatever other picture ppl are claiming to have hasnt resurfaced. But I'm suppose to allow it because it looks "legally ok." The point is we got this. This is why we stick with mostly instagram rules and pictures aka if its allowed there without issue, we allow it.

>>24548 I'm sorry I didn't mean to sound like an attack against the forum. Just a funny observation I'v noticed. But the struggles of the site you mention kind of go to what I was saying about actual law versus assumptions. And it is something I 'v seen on many forums. Of course I'm am speaking in relation to US law. The site may be subject to different laws. Just as I am sure this Clint guy is subject different laws. I heard Emily say she's never been outside of Australia. So I assume Clint is Australian. And observing their laws. Which we all know are bit stricter then other places. In relation to those questionable pics here. I will say that if a pic tends to be focusing on or have the model posed in way as to draw attention to the pubic area, regardless it's nude or not, it should probably be avoided.

>>24551 Sure there's truth to what you said. When we were on 8ch, i argued a lot over what was "legal" based on their interpretation of the law. and even after being strict with the new rules, we were still kicked from the site. We could debate all about what is right or wrong, legal or not and why. My main point in what I said tho was this place isnt the place to ask how to acquire any questionable or illegal material.

>>24551 Clint is from California...he flew to Australia to shoot Emily and some other models

>>25080 My god

>>25085 In that situation he would still have follow Australian laws. Him being used to US laws might explain why he felt it was ok to shoot those photos in the first place. Remember Jessica Biel was 17 when she did that topless shoot for Gear magazine. And those pics were successfully used to defend the legality of other photos like those Clint ones. I'm pretty sure you can still buy books containing such photos in any US book store willing to carry them. But that's the issue. There is difference between law and company policy. People to often get one confused for the other.

>>25089 Sorry, I misspoke about those Biel photos being used to defend. Should have said photos like those Biel ones. Can't say for sure if those specific Photos were used.

There's no definition of what's illegal in Aus, it's whatever a "reasonable adult" would find offensive. It might be alright for him to take those types of photos in the context of professional modeling/photography. But you also have to realize you're dealing with a country which has prosecuted people for lewd Simpsons cartoons and a book last distributed by Harper Collins.

>>25092 And unfortunately, the term "reasonable adult" means almost nothing in the US, citing certain events of the last year.

1 million followers

>>25435 On top of all the obvious stuff...that accent

>>25435 >>25437 FOLLOWAHS

>>25437 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZKrL1g7xGs&hd=1

brehs

>>26462 I see her in nothing but bikinis that now seeing her in a normal school uniform seems hotter to me. wew

interesting random info; "In Australia, Year 10 is the eleventh year of compulsory education. Although there are slight variations between the states, most children in Year 10 are aged between fifteen and sixteen" ...also: :D

>>26475 That's why I posted these pictures... Even if she may have redone a year.

>>26475 Team18YOfags on suicide watch

>>26462 I'm sure the male teachers at her school never ever look at her modeling pics 😉

>>26462 so how old was she when she made the naked pics with pervy clint? also does any of you guys feel concerned about her? she is groomed but SO MANY famous grow ups, football players, djs (nicky romero which seems to be famous), i mean holy shit.

>>27081 eh, those pics were fairly tasteful and not outright salacious. I find the pics where she's showing half her boobs to be lewder than those clint ones. From all these insta "models" I feels like she has the potential to become a very succesful model.

artsy miss Feld

has anyone found footage of her catwalk from the gold coast parade they had proper TV cameras

nicky romero on suicide watch

>>34799 where's the 2nd picture from?

>>34842 boyfriend ig

>>34850 whats his @

>>34882 posting the dudes @ is probably a bad idea... but i'll post more pictures if i see them